Coretsky v. Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
In this appeal we are asked to address a very limited issue, whether the requirements set forth in § 10508 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 508, as amended, 53 P.S. § 10508 are mandatory. The facts are not in dispute.
The Appellee is the owner of a parcel of land which was part of a previously recorded subdivision plan. Because he wished to join together three of his lots into one, thereby dividing his undeveloped land into two lots, the Appellee was required to submit an application for subdivision plan approval to Butler…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bensalem Township v. BlankCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- In re Appeal of JohnstonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by80 opinions
- Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Zane v. Friends HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Oberneder v. Link Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- In Re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of Nov. 4, 2003 General ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.