Legal Opinion

Beck v. Combs

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1959No. Civ. 9522PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Myrtle Broyles Combs, .formerly. Myrtle Broyles, has appealed from a judgment in favor of tbe-. above-named plaintiffs [William 0. Beck and. Florence?.Beck-] in an .action-to quiet title tp; ..certain real p$.0-B-erty,4p.:;;^Iodesto;

• The record shows that, in Mays 1948-, Myrtle Broyles entered into ■a*'conditional sales contract"with-.John?.-Frazier and his wife-; Elsie'L.'Frazier, whereby the. Fraziers agreed-to' sell and Mrs. Broyles agreed to purchase an uninipfóvéd' parcel of real property' in Modesto for' the sum óf '$'650;' payable $10 down and' the'balance in installments óf $10 per…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Kerr v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moeller v. Chun-Yen LienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Wickwire v. McFaddenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Alhambra Redevelopment Agency v. Transamerica Financial ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Bartley v. KarasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Kabayan v. YepremianDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API