Redd v. Hill
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice PARRISH,
opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
11 At issue in this appeal is the question of whether a contingency fee agreement extends to an award of attorney fees. Appellant Virginia Hill entered into a contingency fee agreement (Agreement) with attorney and Appellee Don Redd. The Agreement stated, in part, that "Attorney is entitled to ONE THIRD (88 1/838%) of all monies paid to or in client[']s behalf for what ever [sic] cause related to this cause of action." Hill does not dispute that she willingly signed the Agreement or that Redd is entitled to one-third of Hill's primary award.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Ward v. Intermountain Farmers Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Softsolutions, Inc. v. Brigham Young UniversityUtah Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Porenta v. PorentaUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Danny's Drywall v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Pang v. International Document ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Bresee v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Linebaugh v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.