Pang v. International Document Services
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice DURRANT,
opinion of the Court:
Introduction
T1. This case requires us to determine whether rule 1.18(b) of the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct reflects a clear and substantial public policy of the kind sufficient to prevent companies from terminating in- house legal counsel for reporting illegal activity to management. David K. Pang, an attorney, filed a complaint against his employer alleging that he was terminated for refusing to ignore the company's violation of several states' usury laws. He asserted that the company had effectively asked him to violate the Utah Rules of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- General Dynamics Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Ryan v. Dan's Food Stores, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
- Heslop v. Bank of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Castro v. LemusUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Aguila v. Planned Parenthood of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- Pioneer Home v. TaxHawkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Fehr v. StocktonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.