Legal Opinion
Ward v. Intermountain Farmers Ass'n
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1995No. 940109PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Plaintiff Earl Ward appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Intermountain Farmers Association (“IFA”). We reverse.
“Before we recite the facts, we note that in reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we view the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Higgins v. Salt Lake County, 855 P.2d 231, 233 (Utah 1993). “We state the facts in this case accordingly.” Id.
IFA is a Utah corporation that conducts business in both Utah and Idaho. In March 1988, Ward contracted with IFA, at…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Mind & Motion Utah Investments, LLC v. Celtic Bank Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
- Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Flying J Inc. v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Gillmor v. MacEyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.