Marenco v. DirecTV LLC
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
— In this putative class action, plaintiff Francisco Marenco contends that defendant DirecTV LLC violated state wage and unfair competition laws. (Lab. Code, § 212; Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200; UCL.) DirecTV moved to compel arbitration as the successor to an arbitration agreement between Marenco and his previous employer, 180 Connect, Inc., which was acquired by DirecTV. The trial court granted the motion over Marenco’s objections that DirecTV is not a signatory to the agreement, and that the agreement’s class action waiver is unconscionable under state law.
In this appeal…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jenks v. DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Castillo v. Alere North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Elizabeth Hart v. Charter Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Fiorentine v. Marvell Semiconductor Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Lee v. Joongangilbo USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.