Legal Opinion

Fiorentine v. Marvell Semiconductor Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 14, 2024No. 3:24-cv-01136Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMES FIORENTINE, Case No. 24-cv-01136-MMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 9 v. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; STAYING ACTION 10 MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR INC., Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is defendant Marvell Semiconductor Inc.'s ("MSI") Motion, filed 14 March 31, 2024, "to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Stay 15 Proceedings." Plaintiff James Fiorentine ("Fiorentine") has filed opposition, to which MSI 16 has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bridge Fund Capital Corp. v. Fastbucks Franchise Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Serafin v. Balco Properties Ltd., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API