Legal Opinion

State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Carlson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2012No. S-13818PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We decide one primary issue in this fifth appeal in this case. After our last remand, the superior court entered a judgment awarding the class a principal refund of $12.4 million with prejudgment interest exceeding $62 million. The question presented is whether one of our previous decisions in this case, Carison III, incorrectly decided that the rate of prejudgment interest for unconstitutional commercial fishing license and limited entry permit fee overpayments is the statutorily imposed punitive interest rate for underpaid and overpaid taxes under Title…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. North Slope Borough v. Sohio Petroleum Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Valdez v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Estate of Kim Ex Rel. Alexander v. CoxeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Reasner v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API