Legal Opinion

Kimoktoak v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1978No. 3177PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

Edward Burns Kimoktoak was found guilty by a jury of joyriding under AS 28.35.010 and of failure to render aid and assistance to a person he had run over with a motor vehicle under AS 28.35.060. In this appeal, Kimoktoak challenges his conviction for failure to render aid under AS 28.35.060 on the grounds that the statute is unconstitutional, that two of the instructions given the jury were improper, and that the trial court improperly allowed a sealed verdict over defense objection in violation of Criminal Rule 31(f). He challenges the joyriding conviction solely on the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. HolfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Speidel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Neitzel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  2. People v. NunnIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. GuestAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API