Legal Opinion
Parker v. King
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 12, 1991No. 89-8540PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Senior Circuit Judge:
Appellants, employees of the Social Security Administration, contend that the district court for the Northern District of Georgia has jurisdiction over their claim for overtime violations by virtue of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Appellants assert that since they invoked the jurisdiction of the district court under the “federal question” statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, as well as under the “Little Tucker Act,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), this court has jurisdiction to hear their appeal. Appellees, by contrast, characterize appellants’ allegations as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. HohriSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Michael Zumerling v. Donald J. DevineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Captain James H. Smith v. Secretary of the Air Force, Verne OrrCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Local 560 (i.b.t.), Nominal (Intervenor), in No. 91-5440, and Michael Sciarra Joseph Sheridan, Michael Sciarra, in No. 91-5441Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Abbey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Johnathan Daniel King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Saraco v. HallettDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Parker v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.