Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Johnathan Daniel King v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 30, 2013No. 12-175CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b); Motion to Transfer Denied; Court of Federal Claims may hear FLSA eases after Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Bormes, 133 S.Ct. 12 (2012)

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER

FIRESTONE, Judge.

• In this collective action case, 228 Supervisory Border Patrol Agents, who served as instructors at Border Patrol Academies in Artesia, New Mexico, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, or El Paso, Texas, allege that the United States Customs and Border Protection failed to pay overtime compensation due to them under the Fair Labor…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Navajo NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States v. BormesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Hinck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tamara Barry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Larry D. Tallacus v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. 1 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Anello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API