Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Newark Industrial Spraying, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 23, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
60 N.J. Super. 424 (1960)
159 A.2d 462
ANGEL M. DIAZ, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
NEWARK INDUSTRIAL SPRAYING, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court, Law Division.
Decided March 23, 1960.
Mr. Joseph P. Dunn argued the cause for the petitioner-respondent (Mr. Francis H. Pykon, on brief).
Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the respondent-appellant.
CONKLIN, J.C.C.
Respondent Newark Industrial Spraying, Inc., has appealed from an adverse determination of law centering around an alleged "skylarking" incident involving petitioner Angel M. Diaz and another employee on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hulley v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Secor v. Penn Service GarageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Gilbert v. Gilbert Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Yeomans v. City of JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Robertson v. Express Container Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Cotton Oil Division v. ChildressSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Diaz v. Newark Industrial Spraying, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Diaz v. Newark Industrial Spraying, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Southern Cotton Oil Division v. ChildressSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964