Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Newark Industrial Spraying, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 30, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

65 N.J. Super. 249 (1961)

167 A.2d 662

ANGEL M. DIAZ, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

NEWARK INDUSTRIAL SPRAYING, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 11, 1960.

Decided January 30, 1961.

Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and FOLEY.

Mr. Francis H. Pykon argued the cause for petitioner-respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Dunn, attorney).

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for respondent-appellant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.

Respondent appeals from a judgment of the County Court affirming a judgment of the Workmen's Compensation Division in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Board & Carton Corp. v. BrittingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. McKenzie v. Brixite Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Diaz v. Newark Industrial Spraying, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. McKenzie v. Brixite Manufacturing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rogotzki v. ScheptNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  2. Rockland Elec. Co. v. Bolo Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Southern Cotton Oil Division v. ChildressSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Quinones v. P.C. Richard & SonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  5. Diaz v. Newark Industrial Spraying, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API