Legal Opinion

Southern Cotton Oil Division v. Childress

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 6, 1964No. 5-3162PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case, and necessitates a review of the holdings on the matter of “horse-play”1 or “skylarking. ’ ’

Mrs. Minnie Lee Childress seeks recovery for herself and children because of the death of her husband, George Childress, while in the employ of the appellant, Southern Cotton Oil.2 The facts are without substantial dispute. For many years the appellant, Southern Cotton Oil has had a cottonseed oil mill at Newport. George Childress worked for the appellant for about seven years. On August 15, 1957, he reported for work about 7:00…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Birchett v. Tuf-Nut Garment Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Hughes v. Tapley, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Petro v. Martin Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Johnson v. SafreedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ringier America v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  2. West Tree Service, Inc. v. HopperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Southland Corp. v. HesterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Morales v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Lofland Co. v. SimpkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API