Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Newark Industrial Spraying, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 23, 1961Published

1Opinion of the Court

35 N.J. 588 (1961)

174 A.2d 478

ANGEL M. DIAZ, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

NEWARK INDUSTRIAL SPRAYING, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 26, 1961.

Decided October 23, 1961.

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Francis H. Pykon argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Dunn, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.

This is a workmen's compensation case appeal. An award was granted petitioner, Angel Diaz, by the Division of Workmen's Compensation. The County Court upheld the award, 60 N.J. Super. 424 (Cty. Ct.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. Secor v. Penn Service GarageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API