Legal Opinion

Southern Cotton Oil Division v. Childress

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 6, 1964No. 5-3162Published

1Opinion of the Court

377 S.W.2d 167 (1964)

SOUTHERN COTTON OIL DIVISION, etc., Appellant,

v.

Minnie Lee CHILDRESS et al., Appellees.

No. 5-3162.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

April 6, 1964.

Hout, Thaxton & Hout, Newport, Rose, Meek, House, Barron, Nash & Williamson, Little Rock, for appellant.

Pickens, Pickens & Boyce, Newport, Smith, Williams, Friday & Bowen, Robert V. Light, Little Rock, for appellees.

McFADDIN, Justice.

This is a workmen's compensation case, and necessitates a review of the holdings on the matter of "horse-play"[1] or "skylarking."

Mrs. Minnie Lee Childress seeks recovery for herself and children because of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Phil Hollenbach Co. v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Jacquemin v. Turner & Seymour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API