Southern Cotton Oil Division v. Childress
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
377 S.W.2d 167 (1964)
SOUTHERN COTTON OIL DIVISION, etc., Appellant,
v.
Minnie Lee CHILDRESS et al., Appellees.
No. 5-3162.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
April 6, 1964.
Hout, Thaxton & Hout, Newport, Rose, Meek, House, Barron, Nash & Williamson, Little Rock, for appellant.
Pickens, Pickens & Boyce, Newport, Smith, Williams, Friday & Bowen, Robert V. Light, Little Rock, for appellees.
McFADDIN, Justice.
This is a workmen's compensation case, and necessitates a review of the holdings on the matter of "horse-play"[1] or "skylarking."
Mrs. Minnie Lee Childress seeks recovery for herself and children because of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Phil Hollenbach Co. v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Jacquemin v. Turner & Seymour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.