Legal Opinion

Houser v. Bi-Lo, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 2001PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AndersonAnderson, C.J.

BIRCH, HOLDER, and BARKER, JJ., joined.

In this workers’ compensation case, the widow of the employee, Phil Houser, has appealed from a circuit court judgment denying the employee’s claim for benefits filed against the employer, Bi-Lo, Inc. The employee, who managed the employer’s grocery store, suffered a stroke after becoming upset over unexpectedly receiving an unusually large order of stock. The trial court denied benefits because receiving a large shipment of stock did not constitute an unusual or abnormal circumstance for the manager of a grocery store. The plaintiff appealed,…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Reeser v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Fink v. CaudleTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hill v. Eagle Bend Manufacturing, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Thornton v. RCA Service Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gray v. Cullom MacHine, Tool & Die, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Richards v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Barnett v. Milan Seating SystemsTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Moore v. Town of ColliervilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Anderson v. Westfield GroupTennessee Supreme Court · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API