Legal Opinion

Fink v. Caudle

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1993PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

This case is before the Court upon motion for review pursuant to T.C.A. § 50-6-225(e)(5)(B), the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel’s Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference:

Whereupon, it appears to the Court that the motion for review is not well-taken and should be denied.

It is, therefore, ordered that the Panel’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are adopted and affirmed, and the decision of the Panel is made the judgment…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Brown Shoe Company v. ReedTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hendrix v. Franklin State BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Central Motor Express, Inc. v. BurneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. White v. Werthan IndustriesTennessee Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by82 opinions

  1. Parks v. Tennessee Municipal League Risk Management PoolTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Fritts v. Safety National Casualty Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Blankenship v. American Ordnance Systems, LLSTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hill v. Eagle Bend Manufacturing, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Wilhelm v. KrogersTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API