Legal Opinion

Gray v. Cullom MacHine, Tool & Die, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2004No. E2004-00011-SC-R3-CVPublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AndersonE. Riley Anderson, J.

in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and JANICE M. HOLDER, WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., and ALLEN W. WALLACE, SP.J., joined.

We granted review in this workers’ compensation case to determine whether the trial court erred in 1) awarding temporary total benefits, 2) apportioning liability between the employer and the Second Injury Fund, and 3) awarding 180 weeks of lump-sum benefits. After reviewing the record and applicable authority, we conclude that the trial court erred in awarding temporary total benefits to the employee who continued to work for the employer following his injury and…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Limbaugh v. Coffee Medical CenterTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cleek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lindsey v. Smith and Johnson, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Watt v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Gluck Brothers, Inc. v. CoffeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by62 opinions

  1. Emory v. Memphis City Schools Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Lang v. Nissan North America, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Home Builders Association of Middle Tennessee v. Williamson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Wausau Insurance Co. v. DorsettTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Fusner v. Coop Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API