Legal Opinion

Bush v. Atlas Automobile Finance Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1937No. Appeal, 202PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Plaintiff obtained a verdict against defendant in an action of assumpsit for breach of an alleged parol contract. Defendant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. and new trial were dismissed by the court below, and judgment was entered on the verdict.

Defendant has appealed, and now contends: (1) That the parol agreement was without consideration; (2) that there was no proof that defendant’s representative had authority to make the alleged parol agreement and bind defendant; and (3) that there was no requisite tender made by plaintiff to defendant.

The facts, when we view the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Presbyterian Board of Foreign Missions v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Williams v. BentleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  3. Sisney v. DiffenderfferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Mikos v. KidaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Weigand v. Standard Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gillian v. Consolidated Foods Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corp. v. Richard D. Sweeney and Ruth T. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  3. Candy v. KeanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Associates Discount Corp. v. WiseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Claire Construction Co. v. Gilbert Associates, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API