Legal Opinion

Mikos v. Kida

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1934No. Appeal, 329PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiff brings this action on a promissory note to his order for $6,000 in the usual form signed by Kida, Mladzianowski and Schurgot as makers. At the time suit was brought Schurgot was dead and his executor was named as defendant. On distribution of Schurgot’s estate by the orphans’ court plaintiff had received on account of the note $2,149.80. The jury rendered a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $4,980.70, representing the balance due with interest. The court entered judgment for defendants non obstante veredicto. Plaintiff appeals.

The two living…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hind v. HoldshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  2. Presbyterian Board of Foreign Missions v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Browne v. HoekstraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Byrne v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Harlan v. HarlanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Trust Co. General Mortgage Investment Fund CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Coxe v. KriebelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Bush v. Atlas Automobile Finance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Berks County Trust Co. v. KotzenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Vineland National Bank & Trust Co. v. KotokSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API