Legal Opinion

Gillian v. Consolidated Foods Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1967No. Appeal, 360PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

David Gillian (Gillian), the sole owner of a business concern engaged in the sale of detergents under the name of “Uni-Clean Products” (Uni-Clean), on January 3, 1964, entered the employment of Consolidated Foods Corporation (Consolidated), pursuant to an oral agreement which he had negotiated with James R. Tyson (Tyson), vice-president and general manager of Consolidated. This oral agreement provided that Consolidated would purchase Uni-Clean’s inventory for $2,500, assume certain of Uni-Clean’s outstanding obligations and employ Gillian in a supervisory capacity…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Slonaker v. P. G. Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. ChristianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Girsh TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Lubrecht v. Laurel Stripping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Weidman v. United Cigar Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Charles v. HenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Aurora Pizza Hut, Inc. v. HayterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Aldhelm, Inc. v. Schuylkill County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Green v. Medford Knitwear Mills, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Coventry Care, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API