Associates Discount Corp. v. Wise
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the court below opening a judgment entered by confession under the terms of an automobile lease or agreement.
In granting the equitable relief for which defendant prayed, the court below said: “......the remedies provided in the lease were separate, distinct, and in the alternative, therefore, the plaintiff had its choice; it could either affirm the lease and avail itself of the acceleration clause by entering judgment for the unpaid balance of rental and leave the automobile in defendant’s possession, or it could declare the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Adelman, Trustee v. J. McShain, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. WalukiewiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Bush v. Atlas Automobile Finance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Kweller v. BeckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Associates Discount Corp. v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Sugarman Et Ux. v. BaldiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Alexander v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Alexander v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980