Legal Opinion

Sisney v. Diffenderffer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1936No. Appeal, 186PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The suit is for breach of a contract of agency. The defendants are stockbrokers. The plaintiff had been buying and gelling on margin since 1919, and, July 24, 1929, in writing, requested defendants to take over an account she then had with another broker by accepting “the securities they are carrying in my account and pay them the amount of my debit balance.” The state of the account transferred appeared in a letter from the retiring broker. On the same day she signed a written contract prepared by defendants to govern their relations. Among other terms, it states…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Galigher v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Gunster v. Scranton Illuminating, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Heilig Bros. Co., Inc. v. KohlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Engle v. Shapert Construction Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. BoggsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Thomas v. St. Joseph's Polish Nat. Catholic ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Schofield v. SchofieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API