Herriman v. Menzies
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a. judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M, Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
In this case the defendants appealed to this court from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The appeal from the judgment was heretofore dismissed, and the order denying a new trial affirmed in Department. (Herriman v. Menzies, post, p. 25.) Subsequently, the order dismissing the appeal from the judgment was, upon petition therefor, set aside, and a hearing of the motion ordered in Bank. Since the last order, the appeal from the judgment has been submitted upon the merits, but without a waiver of said motion to dismiss.
The appeal from the judgment involves but one…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santa Clara Valley Mill and Lumber Co. v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Vulcan Powder Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Pacific Factor Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Master Stevedores' Ass'n v. WalshNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1867
- Long v. TowlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Brown & Allen v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.