Legal Opinion

Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 23, 2015No. Case No. 15-cv-02356-JCSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Sanford Wadler brings a whis-tleblower action against Defendants Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (“Bio-Rad”) and the individual members of Bio-Rad’s Board of Directors, contending he was wrongfully terminated in retaliation for investigating and reporting to Bio-Rad’s upper-level management possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) in China. Wadler asserts claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, *1008and California state law.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Geary v. Parexel International CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  2. Ghusain v. WebbDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. Pfeifle v. Portland Terminal Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API