Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Sanford Wadler brings a whis-tleblower action against Defendants Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (“Bio-Rad”) and the individual members of Bio-Rad’s Board of Directors, contending he was wrongfully terminated in retaliation for investigating and reporting to Bio-Rad’s upper-level management possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) in China. Wadler asserts claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, *1008and California state law.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Geary v. Parexel International CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Ghusain v. WebbDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Pfeifle v. Portland Terminal Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021