Legal Opinion

Pfeifle v. Portland Terminal Railroad Company

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 25, 2021No. 3:19-cv-01436Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON GREG PFEIFLE, Case No. 3:19-cv-01436-IM Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. PORTLAND TERMINAL RAILROAD COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, Defendant. Paul S. Bovarnick, Rose, Senders & Bovarnick, LLP, 1205 Nw 25th Avenue, Portland, OR 97210; Kevin C. Brague, The Brague Law Firm, 4504 S Corbett Avenue, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97239. Attorneys for Plaintiff. David Patrick Morrison, Nicholas E. Wheeler, and Amber Beyer, Cosgrave Vergeer Kester, LLP, 900 SW Fifth Avenue, 24th Floor, Portland, OR 97204. Attorneys for Defendant. IMMERGUT,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API