Legal Opinion
Geary v. Parexel International Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 18, 2022No. 5:19-cv-07322Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 WILLIAM JOHN GEARY, Case No. 5:19-cv-07322-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 10 v. 11 PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL Re: Dkt. No. 122 CORPORATION, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff William John Geary III, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Defendant 15 Parexel International Corporation (“Parexel”) and its individual officers, executives, and directors 16 (collectively, “the Individual Defendants”), asserting the following claims: (1) retaliation in 17…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.