Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Roggeman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 11, 2010No. A09-100PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition seeking disciplinary action against attorney Chad Michael Roggeman, alleging that Roggeman lacked thoroughness and preparation in a client matter, neglected the client matter, failed to keep the client informed about the matter, made misrepresentations to the client, and failed to comply with court rules. The court-appointed referee found that Roggeman’s conduct violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 3.2, 3.4(c), 4.1, and 8.4(c) and (d). The referee recommended that Roggeman be publicly…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HougeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against ShaughnessySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Matter of Discipline of DannaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against HarriganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against PiteraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Herbert A. Igbanugo, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0191139. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API