Illinois Leather Co. v. Flynn
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Replevin by the Illinois Leather Company against William H. Elynn, receiver of W. A. Bourke & Company. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Defendant was appointed receiver of the property covered by a chattel mortgage given by W. A. Bourke & Co. to the City Savings Bank of Detroit. Plaintiff, by permission of the court, brought replevin against the receiver for 1,001 bales of hair ordered of plaintiff February 10, 1892, and shipped to Bourke & Co. April 15, 1892. On the trial, plaintiff contended that the goods were bought by Bourke & Co. under circumstances raising a presumption that they received the goods having formed the intention of not paying for them, or, at least, under circumstances that show that a man of ordinary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morris v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Edson v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Doyle v. MiznerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by6 opinions
- B. Berger Co. v. Contract Interiors, Inc. (In Re Contract Interiors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Elbro Knitting Mills v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- David Adler & Sons Clothing Co. v. ThorpWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- German National Bank of Ripon v. Princeton State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Carson v. Milcrow Motor SalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.