Legal Opinion

David Adler & Sons Clothing Co. v. Thorp

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Door •county: S. D. HastiNgs, Je., Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.

This is an action of replevin of certain goods and merchandise sold by the plaintiff’s salesman to the firm of L. D. Thorp & Son, of Egg Harbor, April 26, 1896, and shipped to them by the plaintiff on the next day. May 15, 1896, that firm made a voluntary assignment to the defendant for the benefit of their creditors. May 19, 1896, the plaintiff replevied the goods. At the close of the trial the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant, to the effect that he ivas the owner and entitled to the possession of the property described, that the value thereof was $634, *72and that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morris v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Nichols v. . PinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Rothmiller v. . SteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. People ex rel. Ellis v. HealyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Jenkins v. SteankaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hart v. MoultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hyland v. RoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. In re FriedmanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1908
  4. German National Bank of Ripon v. Princeton State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Consolidated Milling Co. v. FogoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API