Carson v. Milcrow Motor Sales
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
On September 21, 1939, plaintiff, while a college student, was the owner of a 1935 Ford convertible sedan wbicb be wished to sell or trade. He became acquainted with one of tbe Ford Motor Company’s agents, wbo looked after tbe business of tbe company with its dealers. Tbe agent recommended defendant George Holzbaugb, Inc., a retail dealer, for tbe purpose of trading in plaintiff’s car. Plaintiff previously bad tried to sell tbe car. All be could get for it was $110 but Holzbaugb, Inc., agreed to allow him $215 on a trade for a new car to be delivered in 1941, tbe old car to be turned in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zucker v. KarpelesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- John Heidsik Co. v. RechterMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Illinois Leather Co. v. FlynnMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by3 opinions
- Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- B. Berger Co. v. Contract Interiors, Inc. (In Re Contract Interiors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Kalamazoo Manufacturing Co. v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989