Legal Opinion

Edson v. Hudson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Lane, J., presiding.) Trover. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action of trover to recover the value of certain goods sold by the plaintiffs to one William H. Smith, while he ivas engaged in business at Big Rapids, Mich. Mr. Smith was a customer of plaintiffs. At the time this suit was brought, he owed them the following bills sold at the dates given below :

June 26, 1888................................... $2 90

June 26, 1888...................................... 70 05

July 5, 1888--------------------------------------- 4 13

August 21, 1888...•_................................ 279 38

September 8, 1888................................. 534 37

Total…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watson v. SilsbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Rieth-Riley Construction Co. v. First Security Bank (In Re Williams Bros. Asphalt Paving Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986
  3. Illinois Leather Co. v. FlynnMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Missouri Broom Mfg. Co. v. GuymonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API