Potter v. Tone
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference case. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Shepard
This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, awarding priority to Prank J. Tone in an interference proceeding relating to the invention of a production of silicon monoxid. It is described by the Commissioner as a “composition of matter containing principally silicon and oxygen, and may be a brown, amorphous, vitreous solid, or a very fine brown powder.”
The issue is. in the twelve following counts:
1. The within described product, being silicon monoxid SIC.
2. A physically homogeneous, light brown material composed essentially of silicon and oxygen in about the ratio of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. TrevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of BremnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Application of John R. StemniskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Karl Folkers and Clifford H. ShunkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.