Legal Opinion
Watters v. Pelican International, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 17, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-F-1305PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs seek recovery in contribution for a judgment entered against them in prior litigation in this court. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Defendant Pelican International Inc. (“Pelican”) contends that plaintiffs cannot state a claim upon which relief could be granted because Colorado’s Proportionate Fault Statute prevents proof…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. White Mountain Construction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Kussman v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. FrackeltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Shoultz v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Brochner v. Western Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- May Department Stores Co. v. State Ex Rel. WoodardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- McHale v. Alvarez (In Re the 1031 Tax Group, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Song v. City of Elyria, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Deloitte & ToucheDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.