Legal Opinion
May Department Stores Co. v. State Ex Rel. Woodard
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 15, 1993No. 92SC749PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
The State of Colorado brought this action pursuant to the Colorado Consumer Protection Act to recover damages and to enjoin the May Department Stores Company, a New York corporation, d/b/a May D & F (May D & F). Following an eight-day trial to the court, the district court found May D & F’s price comparison advertising violated the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (CCPA), sections 6-1-101 to -115, 2 C.R.S. (1992 & 1993 Supp.). The district court enjoined May D & F from using a promotional mark-up price as a reference price in its advertising in a department of May D & F called the “Home…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- Kraft, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Hall v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Mulligan v. QVC, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Crowe v. TullSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.