Legal Opinion

United States v. Patrick A. Norquay

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1990No. 89-5382PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals from a final order entered in the District Court for the District of Minnesota holding the Federal Sentencing Guidelines inapplicable to a burglary conviction under the Indian Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1153 (1988), and sentencing defendant Patrick A. Norquay under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines. For reversal, the government argues that the district court erred in (1) applying the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines to determine the length of defendant’s sentence, (2) applying Minnesota law to compute good time credits, and (3) applying…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. McBratneySupreme Court of the United States · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Male Juvenile (Pierre Y.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Lewellis ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Antonio MarmolejoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Michael J. BearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API