Legal Opinion

Norton v. E. A. Cowen Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 1964No. 40455PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

On August 30, 1961, Lola P. Norton, as surviving wife and dependent heir of Doyle C. Norton, deceased, filed a claim against E. A. Cowen Construction Company and its insurance carrier, Mid-Continent Casualty Company, for death benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The claim alleged that Doyle C. Norton, on February 13, 1961, suffered an accidental injury consisting of a coronary thrombosis, due to strain and overexertion, causing his death on April 25, 1961.

The answer consisted of a general and specific denial and specifically denied that decedent sustained an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Novak v. McAlisterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. ClowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Ada Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. SneadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Dobson v. Commercial Oil Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Bills Bakeries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Liebmann Arctic Ice Company v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Black, Sivalls & Bryson v. BassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Platner v. Bill Moore ChevroletSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Kinser v. Western Sands, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API