Legal Opinion

Novak v. McAlister

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 26, 1956No. 36868PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding brought by petitioner, Emma Jo Novak, hereinafter called claimant, to review an order of the State Industrial Commission denying her claim for compensation against the respondents, John V. McAlister and Central Surety Company.

The Commission’s order denying the claim was based on a finding that the alleged injury did not arise out of nor in the course of claimant’s employment.

The record discloses that claimant had left the premises where she was employed and had gone to a cafe for lunch on her own time. She sustained an injury upon her return…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. R. J. Allison, Inc. v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Cudahy Packing Co. of Nebraska v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State Highway Commission v. KoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Fudge v. University of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Richey v. Commander Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Stroud Municipal Hospital v. MooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Christian v. Nicor Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Max E. Landry, Inc. v. TreadwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API