Legal Opinion

Dobson v. Commercial Oil Transport, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1962No. 39832PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice.

Dena Mae Dobson, hereinafter called claimant, brought this proceeding in the State Industrial Court against Commercial Oil Transport, Inc., hereinafter called employer, and its insurance carrier, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, to recover under the death benefit provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 85 O.S. 1961 § 1 et seq., by reason of the death of her husband, Joseph S. Dobson. An award was denied by the State Industrial Court and she seeks to review the order in this Court on the sole ground that the State Industrial Court erred as a matter of law in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. R. J. Allison, Inc. v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Cochran v. Maassen Tool & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barnhill v. Smithway Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. In Re MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Jake's Casing Crews, Inc. v. Grant Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Anderson v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Norton v. E. A. Cowen Construction Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API