Legal Opinion

Oberlin v. Friedman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1965No. 39431PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

The Court of Appeals’ determination that the Common Pleas Court erred in giving the first special charge and in its general charge is not supported by the reason which it gave for that determination. That reason is based on the expressed premise that there was evidence “that the defendant followed the usual practice and custom in handling of the two substances on the same tray.” There was no such evidence. Plaintiff did offer evidence tending to prove that the custom and practice in hospitals was to use only colored alcohol where an anesthetic was being administered. Defendant offered no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Ault v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Fink v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Soltz v. Colony Recreation CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Winslow v. Ohio Bus Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jennings Buick, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Howard v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Estate of Hall v. Akron General Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Morgan v. Children's HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Domany v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API