Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Children's Hospital

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1985No. 84-756PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

It must be noted at the outset of this opinion that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is only a rule of evidence which allows the trier of fact to draw an inference of negligence from the facts presented. The trier of facts is permitted, but not compelled, to find negligence.1 This rule is set forth in Jennings Buick, Inc. v. Cincinnati (1980), 63 Ohio St. 2d 167, at 169-170 [17 O.O.3d 102]:

“The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not a substantive rule of law furnishing an independent ground for recovery; rather, it is an evidentiary rule which permits, but does not require, the jury to draw an…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hake v. George Wiedemann Brewing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Benson v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Davis v. KerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Seavers v. Methodist Medical Center of Oak RidgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. States v. Lourdes HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Estate of Hall v. Akron General Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Brokamp v. Mercy Hospital AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Mary Jane Connors and David M. Bliss v. University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API