Legal Opinion
Domany v. Otis Elevator Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1966No. Nos. 16638-16641PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cecil, Senior Circuit Judge.
Mary Domany and her alleged husband, Andrew Domany, plaintiffs-appellees herein, brought these actions against Sears, Roebuck & Company, and Otis Elevator Company, defendants-appellants, hereinafter referred to as Sears and Otis, respectively, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. They recovered judgments in the amounts of $175,000 and $65,000, respectively. Sears and Otis each appealed.
Jurisdiction is invoked on the basis of diversity of citizenship. Section 1332, Title 28, U. S. Code. Mary and Andrew Domany,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glowacki v. North Western Ohio Ry. & Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
- Fink v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Joffre v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Wilkeson v. Erskine & Son, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Higginbotham v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Jose Domingo Colmenares Vivas v. Sun Alliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Bulloch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.