Legal Opinion

Jennings Buick, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1980No. 79-975PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Per curiam

In its first proposition of law, appellant contends that the right to rely upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is waived where the plaintiff fails to indicate such reliance prior to the conclusion of trial. We disagree.

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not a substantive rule of law furnishing an independent ground for recovery; rather, it is an evidentiary rule which permits, but does not require, the jury to draw an inference of negligence when the logical premises for the inference are demonstrated. Glowacki v. North Western Ohio Ry. & Power Co. (1927), 116 Ohio St. 451, paragraph one…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGrath v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Hake v. George Wiedemann Brewing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Glowacki v. North Western Ohio Ry. & Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Fink v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Pacher v. Invisible Fence of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Lauren Ross v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Estate of Hall v. Akron General Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Morgan v. Children's HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Ray v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API