Legal Opinion
Winslow v. Ohio Bus Line Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1947No. 30847PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
The special instruction No. 1 which the-Court of Appeals found to be error reads as follows:
“Now the court tells you that it is established by the-evidence that the collision was caused by negligence of' The Ohio Bus Line Company bus.
“Therefore, if you find that the collision proximately caused plaintiff to be injured by coming in contact with or being forced upon or against any object in the-seat of the New Miami bus, you should return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against The Ohio Bus-Line Company for the full amount of her damage-proximately resulting from such injury.
“And in such…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Glowacki v. North Western Ohio Ry. & Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
- Fink v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Schieffelin v. . HylanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Couk v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Soltz v. Colony Recreation CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Oberlin v. FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Pearson v. Gardner Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Domany v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.