Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Shipley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1998No. WCB 95-02156; CA A92310; SC S44301PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

The question in this workers’ compensation case is where to resolve a medical services dispute that claimant raised before the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) at a hearing that originally had been set to review a denial of compensability. We hold that the Board did not have authority to conduct a hearing involving a medical services dispute.

Claimant suffered a compensable left knee injury in September of 1989. The resulting claim was closed in 1991 with an award of temporary and permanent partial disability. Claimant’s left knee symptoms persisted for some period, and he took medications…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Wink v. MarshallOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. SAIF Corporation v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Gaynor v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Or. Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. Dep't of Transp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Steiner v. E.J. Bartells Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API