Legal Opinion

Gaynor v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 2000No. CA A100071PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) order that, among other things, extended petitioner’s post-prison supervision term from 36 months to lifetime supervision. We hold that the Board does not have the statutory authority to extend a post-prison supervision term beyond the term imposed by the trial court. We therefore reverse the Board’s decision that increased petitioner’s post-prison supervision term to lifetime supervision and reinstate the trial court’s judgment of 36 months of post-prison supervision.

Petitioner was convicted of murder, ORS…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. SAIF Corp. v. ShipleyOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. City of Klamath Falls v. Environmental Quality CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kessler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. State ex rel. State Office for Services to Children & Families v. Klamath TribeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Oregon State Denturist Ass'n v. Board of DentistryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Steiner v. E.J. Bartells Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API