Wink v. Marshall
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
Plaintiff brought this action for damages ágainst the estate of Michael Talbott, a deceased motorist. The defendant, as the purported administrator of the estate, appeals from a judgment for plaintiff. .
Talbott was driving his own automobile and was killed in a collision .with the plaintiff’s automobile. There is some question under ORS 30.080 whether there was sufficient evidence to justify submitting the case to the jury. However, the sufficiency of the evidence need not detain us, for it appears that the action, as filed, did not lie in any event. ■
The trial court did not have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Fox v. LasleyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Anderson, Adm. v. CloughOregon Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by24 opinions
- Richard v. SlateOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- SAIF Corp. v. ShipleyOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Multnomah County Sheriff's Office v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2007
- In re SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.