Legal Opinion
Multnomah County Sheriff's Office v. Edwards
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 2017No. BOLI 0114; CA A157146; SC S064109PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
ORS 408.230(2)(c) requires a public employer to “devise and apply methods” of giving veterans and disabled veterans “special consideration” in the employer’s hiring process when that hiring process does not rank applicants by means of a score. The issue in this case is whether the Multnomah County Sheriffs Office (county) complied with that requirement when it failed to promote a disabled veteran. The Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) concluded that the county did fail to comply with the statute, as well as administrative rules that implement it. BOLI ordered the county to comply with the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. S.-Q. K. (In re S.-Q. K.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Dept. of Human Services v. C. M. H.Oregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Gadalean v. Saif Corp. (In re Comp. of Gadalean)Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
- Menten and DeatherageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Klein v. Or. Bureau of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.