Legal Opinion
James F. Taylor v. MacE Knapp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1989No. 87-2510PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
871 F.2d 803
James F. TAYLOR, et al., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mace KNAPP, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-2510.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 18, 1988.*
Decided March 21, 1989.
Concurring Opinion March 30, 1989.
James F. Taylor, Carson City, Nev., in pro. per.
John H. Cary, Deputy Atty. Gen., Carson City, Nev., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, SNEED and HUG, Circuit Judges.
GOODWIN, Chief Judge:
1
James Taylor appeals the grant of summary judgment against him in his 42 U.S.C.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- (HC) Baker v. MunizDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (HC) Montgomery v. LozanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Ryan v. City of LincolnDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019